Paid news has become a very popular
means of conveying manipulated truth (at times truth), to the public, making it
harder for them to understand its authenticity.
Concentration of media ownership
across different segments like TV, Printing media, Internet etc. has triggered
more paid news. It also becomes a very strong and easy source of financial help
for small scale media houses, competing against bigger players in the market.
But the problem which it can create is that people might get very wrong
perception of someone mistakenly or might get an ultra positive notion about
someone, and any such false article, if circulated among citizens, especially
during elections, can turn around results dramatically. It becomes even more
difficult to identify the correctness of the news when there is same news
everywhere and user eventually tends to start believing it as a fact.
There has to be strong
regulations on this. PCI should pitch in, whenever they find a case of false
information supplied by media houses and impose heavy penalties on them. In
case of repetition of such case by same authority, it should suspend its
activity temporarily, sending a strong message to other media players.
Individual reader or viewer can go to court for any such wrong doings, but it’s
generally ignored unless his interest has been affected. Many a times the
common man gets hesitant, seeing the enormous power of the media company.
There
has to be a check on concentration of ownership across different segments which
otherwise creates monopoly, which is not so good for democracy. Although it
questions Right to speech and expression, and to an extent, Right to free trade
and business, but in the broader perspective of the welfare of the state, it
needs to curtail such powers of dominance by bigger players.
No comments:
Post a Comment